Editorial policy

Accuracy and sourcing

• We link the sources behind factual claims and prefer primary sources: FDA, peer-reviewed journals, court records, and provider sites.
• Every price shows the date we checked it and a link to where we found it.
• When we rely on third-party reports (for example, for ratings we can't check directly), we say so.

Health-claim rules

• We never describe compounded drugs as generic or FDA-approved, and we never claim they match a brand-name drug.
• We always state that compounded drugs are not FDA-approved and not reviewed by FDA for safety, effectiveness, or quality.
• We attach efficacy figures only to the FDA-approved products studied, never to compounded products.
• We don't promise or imply guaranteed results.

Testing and reviews

We don't claim hands-on testing unless we actually did it, and the article will say so plainly. We don't publish fake or paid customer testimonials.

Medical review

In progress. We haven't engaged a licensed clinician reviewer yet, so articles don't carry a medical-review credit. When a real, verifiable reviewer is in place, reviewed articles will show their name, credentials, and review date.

Advertisers and our content

Business relationships don't influence scores, rankings, or conclusions. Advertisers don't review or approve content before publication.

Corrections and updates

We aim to re-check key pages at least monthly. If you spot an error, contact us. We'll investigate and update the page, noting significant corrections.

AI assistance

We may use software tools, including AI, to help gather and organize public data. Humans are responsible for the final content, sourcing, and accuracy.